FRANCHISE·WATCH·DESK

From the filed FDD — automated extraction, check the source

2026 FDD

SBA-eligible · directory code S1128 since 2017

MONSTER TREE SERVICE

Lawn care, landscaping & trees · parent company: not identified

Monster Tree Service is a tree care franchise providing tree trimming, removal, stump grinding, and plant health care. A franchisee operates an equipment-heavy service business with bucket trucks, chippers, and trained crews, serving residential and commercial property owners.

MONSTER TREE SERVICE net unit count declined 38.2% over 2023–2025 per its FDD Item 20.

New to franchising? Start here

A franchise is a business where you (the franchisee) pay a company (the franchisor) for the right to open and run a location using their brand and system — think a local Anytime Fitness or Taco John's owned by a small-business owner, not the corporation.

Before you can buy in, U.S. law requires the franchisor to give you a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) — a long legal filing covering its fees, finances, and history. Most numbers on this page come from that document; others come from federal SBA loan records and labor and census data, each labelled with its source:

  • Franchise fee — the one-time cost to buy in.
  • Royalty — the ongoing cut of your sales you pay the franchisor.
  • Item 20 — how many locations opened, transferred and left the system, the main basis for our verdict, which rates how strong the disclosed record is, or says when the system is too new, the filing too old, or the disclosure too thin to judge.

Our rating · opinion

Weaker disclosed record

Below our threshold on the operating record we compute from Item 20 — unit growth, the mix of exits, owner turnover and promise-keeping. What pulls it down: units fell 38% (2023–2025: 217 → 134); most exits were terminations or closures rather than transfers to new owners; the fiscal 2025 exit rate was 24.4%, well above the 7.4% median across 82 comparable systems (home services). SBA loans to its franchisees approved FY2016–2020 charged off more often than franchise loans of the same years (6 vs about 3.9 expected, 1.5×; on this few loans a gap this size could still be partly chance). This is our opinion of the filing, not a finding about the franchisor's finances.

Exit rate · fiscal 2025

24.4%

vs 7.4% median across 82 comparable systems (home services)

Cost to open

$335K–$490K

Item 7 total investment range

SBA loan losses · vs same-year loans

1.5×

6 of 38 charged off vs ~3.9 expected

Market density · Texas

Thin market

51% thinner than the national average

Email me when this brand’s record changes

A weekly check for new filings, changes to disclosed costs or earnings, SBA loan totals, and verified public-record events. Only changes to these 1 selected brand. No email when nothing changes. Coverage depends on when source data reaches our database.

Unsubscribe in any alert. We never sell your email.

Data as of 2026-10-29. Figures come from MONSTER TREE SERVICE's public FDD filings (latest: MN 2026, extracted 2026-07-23) and SBA FOIA loan records (through FY2026), extracted by us and possibly containing errors. The rating is our opinion, not investment, legal, or tax advice. Franchisor or owner and see something wrong? Report a correction — we review every request.

Buying an existing MONSTER TREE SERVICE? Transfer fee $10,000, resale record and asking-price check →

What each source says

FDD record · SBA loans · model · auditor

Our answer: Weaker disclosed record

The sources broadly agree, and the verdict follows the FDD's operating record.

FDD record · Item 20

Weaker operating record

Units fell 38% (2023–2025: 217 → 134); exit rate 24.4% (fiscal 2025) vs 7.4% median.

SBA loans · vs same-year loans

More defaults than expected (could be chance) (1.5×)

6 charge-offs among 38 resolved loans approved FY2016–2020; about 3.9 expected.

Modeled risk

Elevated

Riskier than 74% of scored systems.

Auditor opinion · Item 21

Clean opinion

Unqualified audit, 2026 FDD. Says nothing about franchisee results.

Behind the verdict

the record, factor by factor · Item 20

hi-1.0.0
Net unit growth41%

latest consecutive years · Item 20 Table 1

Weak
Exit quality29%

terminations + ceased-ops vs. all exits · Table 3

Weak
Transfer / churn18%

transfers vs. base · Table 3

Strong
Promise-keeping12%

actual vs. projected openings · Table 5

Strong
Transparencynot in verdict

Item 19 disclosure + completeness · shown, not counted in the verdict

Strong

Systemwide units

2023–2025

-38.2%
217202317620241342025

Survival record

FDD Item 20 · outlet status by year

In fiscal 2025, 43 of 176 franchised outlets left the system — an exit rate of 24.4% (fiscal 2025), vs a 7.4% median across 82 comparable systems (home services). An exit is not a failure: this counts terminations, non-renewals and "ceased — other reasons" as reported, and excludes transfers to new owners.

Show the outlet tables ↓
Status (FTC)202320242025
Outlets at start250217176
Opened15101
Transfers9611
Terminations33115
Non-renewals002
Reacquired by franchisor000
Ceased — other reasons153736
Outlets at end217176134
Net change-33-41-42

The franchisor's own finances

FDD ITEM 21 · AUDITED STATEMENTS · 2026 FDD

Full read →

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP gave an unmodified (clean) opinion on the statements in the 2026 FDD; revenue rose 4% from FY2023 to FY2025 and it reported a net loss in FY2024.

This is the company selling the franchise, not any franchisee. A clean opinion means the statements are fairly presented — not that the business is healthy.

Audit opinion

Unmodified (clean) opinion

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP · p. 199

Revenue · FY2025

$227.8M

p. 202 · matched to statement

Net income · FY2025

$19.9M

p. 202 · matched to statement

Where FY2025 revenue came from

78% royalties

6% initial / development fees

Show the statement figures ↓
Fiscal yearFY2023FY2024FY2025
Total revenue$219.1Mp. 202 · matched to statement$226.4Mp. 202 · matched to statement$227.8Mp. 202 · matched to statement
Royalty revenue$172.3Mextracted · not cross-checked$179.0Mextracted · not cross-checked$178.6Mextracted · not cross-checked
Initial / development feesline: Franchise sales fees$12.9Mp. 202$11.6Mp. 202$13.6Mp. 202
Net income (loss)$8.2Mp. 202 · matched to statement−$14.4Mp. 202 · matched to statement$19.9Mp. 202 · matched to statement
Cash at year endnot extracted$51Kp. 201$94Kp. 201

The lender's view

SBA 7(a)/504 loan outcomes · compared with franchise loans of the same years

Banks have made 97 SBA-backed loans to MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchisees since 2016. Of the 38 approved FY2016–2020 that have resolved, 6 charged off — where about 3.9 would be expected for franchise loans made in the same years. That is 1.5× the expected rate: these loans defaulted far more often than comparable franchise loans (a gap this size on this many loans could be chance).

All-time, 6 of 57 resolved loans charged off (10.5%). That raw figure mixes every approval year since 2016 — loans made in 2006–08 failed at several times the rate of loans made in 2010–13 across all franchises — so it is shown as evidence, not as the score. 41% of the brand's loans have not resolved yet.

Loss vs same-year loans

1.5×

6 of 38 resolved (FY2016–2020) vs ~3.9 expected

All-time charge-off · raw

10.5%

6 of 57 resolved, every approval year

Loss given default

—

charged-off $ ÷ approved $, defaulted loans

Avg. loan · FY2020+

$476,917

what recent franchisees borrowed

Median time to default

—

shown with 10+ defaults

Lenders · FY21+ vs FY16–20

23 vs 20

distinct banks still lending

Charge-off rate by loan approval year (%) · dashed line = all franchise loans that year

0'181315'200'21

SOURCE: SBA 7(a)/504 FOIA LOAN DATA (DATA.SBA.GOV), FY1991–PRESENT · MATCHED TO MONSTER TREE SERVICE BY SBA FRANCHISE NAME/CODE · RESOLVED = CHARGED-OFF + PAID-IN-FULL · EXPECTED = SAME-YEAR RATE ACROSS ALL SBA FRANCHISE LOANS, LOANS ≥ ~6 YEARS OLD

The owner's side of the deal

FDD × federal loan record

Elevated debt load

A typical MONSTER TREE SERVICE buyer since 2020 borrowed $477K through SBA — about $67K a year in debt service. Against the brand's own disclosed median unit revenue of $549K, that is 12.1% of the revenue the business takes in, before payroll, vehicles, supplies, insurance, and royalty.

This estimate is computed by software from the brand's public filings and any inputs you enter. No CPA prepared it for you and no assurance is provided on it. Actual results will differ, and the differences may be material.

Who finances it

Stearns Bank National Association

13.5% of this brand's loans

That lender charges off 12.1% of its resolved SBA loans to other franchise brands in the FOIA file, vs 14.8% nationally — a read on that lender's portfolio mix, not a finding about the bank.

Who buys it

67.0%

borrowers with no other franchise SBA loan on record

The rest already owned at least one other franchise. Across the corpus, brands bought mostly by repeat operators have charged off less often than brands sold mostly to newcomers (see methodology).

Does experience help here?

−7.6pp

multi-unit vs single-unit owners

Owners of multiple units default at 5.9%; single-unit owners at 13.5% (each on 15+ resolved loans, owners identified by borrower-name matching).

Computed from 97 SBA 7(a)/504 loans matched to MONSTER TREE SERVICE by SBA franchise code in the SBA FOIA file. Debt service assumes level amortization at the average disclosed term and rate. Owner-level splits rely on borrower-name matching and may misclassify. A lender's rate excludes its loans to this brand, so it reads the lender, not the brand.

What it costs — and what it drags

FDD Items 5–7 · fees, investment, royalty

Buying in means a $49,500 franchise fee (Item 5) and a total investment of $335K–$490K (Item 7). The franchisor publishes an earnings claim (Item 19) — read its methodology closely.

To open (Item 7)

$335K–$490K

all-in investment range

Franchise fee (Item 5)

$49,500

upfront, one-time

Royalty (Item 6)

6.5%

of sales, ongoing

If a unit does this in annual sales…$550K/yr

Starts at the Item 19 median of $549K from MONSTER TREE SERVICE’s latest FDD. Read which units built that figure, then check it with current and former owners.

Royalty you'd pay / yr

$36K

6.5% of sales, before profit

Over a 10-yr term

$358K

royalties alone, excl. ad fund

This estimate is computed by software from the brand's public filings and any inputs you enter. No CPA prepared it for you and no assurance is provided on it. Actual results will differ, and the differences may be material.

This is not profit. It covers what the FDD fixes: what you put in, and the royalty you owe on sales. Your take-home depends on labor, vehicles, supplies, insurance, and the months to breakeven, none of which the FDD fixes for your unit (some Item 19s include cost data — read it).

Build a real pro-forma for MONSTER TREE SERVICE with a buyer-paid CPA

How the earnings claim is built

FDD ITEM 19 · BASIS · 2026 FDD

The headline figure is Average Gross Revenue per Territory for FY2025 (calendar 2025), for 142 of 142 units, leaving out franchisees that ceased operation during 2025.

Graded on three things the filing states: coverage (2 points if the figure covers at least 75% of the units it is compared with, 1 point for 50–75%), centre (2 points if it prints both a median and a mean, 1 for one of them), and costs (2 points for costs through a profit line or full cost detail, 1 for some cost items). 5–6 points = More complete, 3–4 = Partial, 0–2 = Limited. The grade describes the disclosure, not the business.

More completeCovers 142 of 142 units (100%) · median and mean · costs to a profit line
Show the basis ↓
What is measuredAverage Gross Revenue per Territory (gross sales)
PeriodFY2025 (calendar 2025)
Whose resultsFranchised outlets
Units included142 of 142 Territories operated by 60 franchisees at Dec 31, 2025
Left out
  • franchisees that ceased operation during 2025 (15)
Average (mean)$575K
Median$549K
Mean vs medianmean 4.6% above median
Met or beat the average63 (44%)
Costs shownYes — through a profit line
Wherep. 82 (Item 19 runs pp. 81–87)
The filing's words“Table 2 below reports on 142 Territories that were in operation for the entire 2025 fiscal year, ranked by quartile”

Modeled risk

FDD Risk Score · a prediction from disclosure and loan-file features

Elevated · modeled

Modeled from the public record, this brand looks riskier than 74% of the systems we score (elevated band).

Observed · vs same-year loans

1.5×

6 of 38 seasoned loans charged off

Risk percentile

74th

Checkable · higher = riskier

Modeled · vs same-year loans

1.4×

≈ 22.5% at the all-loan vintage mix

Top drivers: Item 20 exit rate (raises) · Share financed by high-loss lenders (lowers) · Net unit growth (lowers) · System size (log units) (raises). The brand has 30+ seasoned resolved SBA loans, so the score can be checked against its own record. A linear scorecard trained on brands' vintage-adjusted SBA loss records; full spec and cross-validated accuracy on the methodology page. A score is context, not a verdict.

Public records

Bankruptcy, closure & federal court records · coverage is selective · dockets are not scored

We have no verified public-record signals published for MONSTER TREE SERVICE. This is not evidence that no events exist. Check PACER, the FDD's Item 3 (litigation) and Item 4 (bankruptcy), and recent news yourself.

12 questions to ask a MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchisee

Built from this brand's own disclosures · take it to your validation calls

The franchisor will give you a list of owners to call. Most buyers ask whether they like it. These questions come from what MONSTER TREE SERVICE has disclosed. Each one carries the number it came from, so you can check the answer against the record.

  1. 01

    MONSTER TREE SERVICE’s own Item 20 shows 43 of 176 franchised outlets left the system in fiscal 2025 — about 24.4%. Do you know any of those owners, and do you know why they left?

    A franchisor will call these “transitions.” An owner three doors down usually knows whether they sold at a profit or handed the keys back.

    FDD Item 20 · FY2025

  2. 02

    11 units transferred to new owners in fiscal 2025. When you look at those, were they people cashing out a good business — or getting out of a bad one?

    Item 20 counts transfers as neutral, but a transfer can be a good sale or a reluctant exit — the filing does not say which.

    FDD Item 20 · FY2025

  3. 03

    The system went from 217 units to 134 over 3 disclosed years. What's the explanation you've been given, and do you believe it?

    A shrinking system means fewer owners funding the ad fund and support staff you're paying for.

    FDD Item 20 · FY2023–FY2025

  4. 04

    SBA loans to MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchisees approved 2016–2020 defaulted far more often than franchise loans made in the same years: 6 charge-offs among 38 resolved loans, where about 3.9 would be expected (1.5×). Did you finance with an SBA loan, and how close did your first two years come to trouble?

    This is the lender's view of how these loans ended, from public federal records matched by SBA franchise code — independent of anything the franchisor discloses — compared with franchise loans made in the same years. A charge-off is a loan outcome, not proof the business closed.

    SBA 7(a)/504 loan record, seasoned loans FY2016–FY2020 · 1.5× of same-vintage franchise loans

  5. 05

    Item 7 says the low end to open is $335K; the average recent SBA loan to MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchisees was $477K. What did you actually spend to open, all in — and did your loan cover anything beyond the build-out?

    Lenders size loans to the project they finance. If owners say they spent near the loan figure rather than the Item 7 floor, budget from what they spent.

    FDD Item 7 vs SBA approvals FY2020+

  6. 06

    You pay 6.5% royalty on gross sales, plus the ad fund, before any of your own costs. On your actual revenue last year, what did you take home as the owner — not revenue, take-home?

    Royalty is charged on sales, not profit. This is the number the brochure never shows and the one your life actually runs on.

    FDD Item 6

  7. 07

    MONSTER TREE SERVICE makes an earnings claim in Item 19. Does your unit look like that number — and do you know which units they included to build it?

    Item 19 is legal to build from a flattering subset. Ask whether they excluded new units, closed units, or company stores.

    FDD Item 19 · 2026

  8. 08

    How many months did it take to cover your own costs, and how much cash did you burn getting there?

    Ramp-to-breakeven working capital is the most underestimated line in any franchise purchase, and the most common reason otherwise-good units fail.

    Not disclosed in any FDD — ask an owner

  9. 09

    Item 3 discloses 1 legal matter. Do you know what it was about, and was it brought by franchisees?

    Franchisee-brought suits over territory, fees or support tell you how the franchisor behaves when there's a disagreement.

    FDD Item 3 · 2026

  10. 10

    What does the franchisor charge for that you didn't expect — required tech fees, mandatory remodels, approved-supplier pricing?

    Required spending appears across Items 6, 8 and 11 rather than in one place, so buyers routinely miss the total.

    FDD Items 6, 8, 11

  11. 11

    If your agreement came up for renewal tomorrow at current terms, would you sign again?

    The single most predictive question you can ask. A hesitation is the answer.

    Ask every owner you speak to

  12. 12

    Who else should I call — including someone who left?

    The franchisor's list is curated by definition. Former franchisees are where the unflattering truth lives, and current owners usually know how to reach them.

    Ask every owner you speak to

Want this as a checklist you can take to the calls?

I'll email you the printable version, and tell you if MONSTER TREE SERVICE’s numbers move — a new filing, a rising exit rate, a distress signal. Unsubscribe in one click.

Before you sign anythingfree · 30 min · no commission

A broker is usually paid by the franchisor to place you. I'm paid only by you, never by a franchisor you're considering — and the job is pressure-testing MONSTER TREE SERVICE’s numbers, including talking you out of a bad deal.

Don Drummond, CPA — Virginia #43775 · what I charge

Book a free 30-minute call →
Own or owned a MONSTER TREE SERVICE — or represent the franchisor?no appointment · read by a person

This page is what buyers see before they call you for validation. If the record above is wrong — or right in a way the numbers can't show — say so. Franchisors: send corrections with the page reference and we will review them against the filing and update or annotate the page. Corrections are checked against the filings; nothing you write is published with your name unless you agree to it.

MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchise questions, answered from the filings

How many MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchised outlets left the system last year?

In MONSTER TREE SERVICE's latest FDD Item 20 (fiscal 2025), 43 of 176 franchised outlets left the system — an exit rate of 24.4% — compared with a 7.4% median across 82 comparable systems (home services) tracked here. That counts terminations, non-renewals, and "ceased operations — other reasons" as the franchisor reported them; it excludes transfers to new owners. The FDD does not say why each outlet left, and an exit is not the same as a failure.

How much does a MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchise cost?

Per MONSTER TREE SERVICE's 2026 FDD, buying in requires an initial franchise fee of $49,500 (Item 5) and a total initial investment of $335K–$490K (Item 7).

What royalty does MONSTER TREE SERVICE charge?

MONSTER TREE SERVICE charges an ongoing royalty of 6.5% of gross sales, per Item 6 of its 2026 FDD.

Does MONSTER TREE SERVICE disclose earnings (Item 19)?

Yes — MONSTER TREE SERVICE makes a financial performance representation in Item 19 of its 2026 FDD, reporting a median unit volume of $549K. Read it closely: franchisors choose which units and which metrics to include.

How often do SBA loans for MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchises default?

SBA loans to MONSTER TREE SERVICE franchisees approved 2016–2020 defaulted far more often than franchise loans made in the same years: 6 charge-offs among 38 resolved loans, where about 3.9 would be expected (1.5×). All-time, 6 of 57 resolved loans since 2016 charged off (10.5%); that raw figure mixes every approval year, so we compare with same-year loans instead. A charge-off is a loan loss, not proof the business closed. Source: public SBA 7(a)/504 FOIA data.