SBA 7(a)/504 FOIA · FY1991–PRESENT · CALIFORNIA
Property Management Inc. franchise in California: what the public record shows
Franchisees of Property Management Inc. in California have taken 6 SBA loans in the FY1991–present FOIA files (average $176,983). Fewer than 30 of them were approved through FY2020 and have resolved, so no local loss ratio is published. Property Management Inc. has too few seasoned resolved loans nationally for a national ratio. Its latest FDD Item 20 state table reports 37 franchised outlets in California (fiscal 2025) — about 0.09 per 100k residents.
Loans in CA
6
Charged off (all years)
1 of 2
Loss ratio in CA
—
Loss ratio nationally
—
Source: SBA 7(a)/504 FOIA files (data.sba.gov), borrower state = CA. Loss ratio = charge-offs among loans approved through FY2020 ÷ the charge-offs expected if each had defaulted at the national rate for franchise loans approved the same year; 1.0× is the same. Only charged-off and paid-in-full loans count. A ratio is shown at 30+ such loans; “not clear” marks a ratio chance alone could produce. The all-years count mixes every era and is evidence, not a rate to compare. Borrowers are matched to the brand by name and SBA franchise code; some matches may be wrong or missing.
Businesses in this industry
22,552
statewide, all operators
Per 100k residents
57.2
national 47.9
Versus the country
+19%
denser
Every business in Property Management Inc.'s industry operating in California — franchised and independent — from the Census Bureau's County Business Patterns (2023), against 2024 population estimates. Counter-intuitively, density is not a warning: across the brand-state cells in the loan data, denser markets have historically charged off less often than the thinnest (see the research page). A crowded market is usually proven demand; an empty one is often empty for a reason.
Avg weekly wage, this industry
$2,183
California, BLS QCEW 2025
National average
$1,785
same industry, all states
Versus the country
+22%
costlier to staff
What Property Management Inc.'s industry actually pays workers in California, from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (2025), employment-weighted across counties. This cost signal is independent of the FDD: a market can look demand-rich above and still carry a margin headwind here if local wages run hot for the sector.
| Fiscal year | Franchised | Company-owned |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 34 | — |
| 2024 | 35 | — |
| 2025 | 37 | — |
| System | Loans in CA | Charged off (all years) | Loss ratio in CA | Units in CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE/MAX | 50 | 3 of 36 | 0.5×NOT CLEAR | 239 |
| Century 21 | 42 | 5 of 28 | — | — |
| REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT | 17 | 1 of 10 | — | 43 |
| Coldwell Banker (Real Estate Brokers | 12 | 3 of 8 | — | — |
Other systems in Property Management Inc.'s sector whose franchisees borrowed in California. A loss ratio appears only where at least 30 loans approved through FY2020 have resolved; “—” means too few.
A broker is usually paid by the franchisor to place you. I'm paid only by you, never by a franchisor you're considering — and the job is pressure-testing Property Management Inc.’s numbers, including talking you out of a bad deal.