FRANCHISE·WATCH·DESK

Loan record only — SBA data verified, FDD not yet in our corpus

SBA-eligible · directory code S0197 since 2017

Baymont Inn & Suites

Hotels & Hospitality · independent · est. —

Baymont Inn & Suites is a midscale hotel brand in the Wyndham family offering limited-service properties with complimentary breakfast. A franchisee owns and operates a hotel under the brand's flag and reservation system, serving value-oriented business and leisure travelers.

New to franchising? Start here

A franchise is a business where you (the franchisee) pay a company (the franchisor) for the right to open and run a location using their brand and system — think a local Anytime Fitness or Taco John's owned by a small-business owner, not the corporation.

Before you can buy in, U.S. law requires the franchisor to give you a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) — a long legal filing covering its fees, finances, and history. The numbers on this page come straight from that document:

  • Franchise fee — the one-time cost to buy in.
  • Royalty — the ongoing cut of your sales you pay the franchisor.
  • Item 20 — how many locations opened and closed, the basis for our verdict (from Proven & strong down to Distressed — or Too new to judge).

The verdict

Not enough disclosure

Distress

0
STABLE

No verified FDD extraction to judge from. Any figures shown are labelled sample data or independent federal records.

SBA loan defaults

3.5%

vs 14.8% avg across rated brands

Behind the verdict

the record, factor by factor · Item 20

No score available.

Systemwide units

Insufficient trend data.

What this page is — and isn'tno FDD on file

We hold no Franchise Disclosure Document for Baymont Inn & Suites, so this page carries no exit rate, fees, investment range, or Item 19 earnings claim. What it does carry is the federal loan record: every SBA 7(a) and 504 loan made to a Baymont Inn & Suites franchisee since 1991 and how each one ended. That is an independent, sourced measure of how the brand's owner-operators actually fared — and for most brands it is the only outcome data that exists publicly.

Brands enter the index this way when they don't register in the states we crawl. We add the filing when we obtain it — see methodology for how coverage is built and what each evidence level means.

The lender's view

SBA 7(a)/504 loan performance · FY1991–present

Banks have made 305 SBA-backed loans to Baymont Inn & Suites franchisees since 2013. Of the 144 that have resolved, 3.5% were charged off (defaulted) rather than paid in full, versus 14.8% across 576 rated brands.

Charge-off rate

3.5%

5 of 144 resolved defaulted

Loss given default

52.5%

avg. charged-off $ ÷ approved $

Expected loss

1.8%

default rate × loss severity

Avg. loan · FY2020+

$2,340,462

what recent franchisees borrowed

Median time to default

81 mo

approval → charge-off, defaulted loans

Lenders · FY21+ vs FY16–20

44 vs 50

distinct banks still lending

Charge-off rate by loan approval year (%)

0'1410507'187000'22

SOURCE: SBA 7(a)/504 FOIA LOAN DATA (DATA.SBA.GOV), FY1991–PRESENT · MATCHED TO BAYMONT INN & SUITES BY FRANCHISE NAME · RESOLVED = CHARGED-OFF + PAID-IN-FULL

The owner's side of the deal

FDD × federal loan record

Who finances it

Gbank

13.6% of this brand's loans

That lender charges off 2.0% of its loans to other franchise brands, vs 14.8% nationally.

Who buys it

76.9%

first-time franchise owners

The rest already owned at least one other franchise. Across the corpus, brands bought mostly by repeat operators charge off at roughly 10% versus 17% for brands sold mostly to newcomers.

Does experience help here?

1.0pp

multi-unit vs single-unit owners

Owners of multiple units default at 2.8%; single-unit owners at 3.8%.

Computed from 305 SBA 7(a)/504 loans to Baymont Inn & Suites franchisees joined to the brand's own FDD. Debt service assumes level amortization at the average disclosed term and rate. A lender's rate excludes its loans to this brand, so it reads the lender, not the brand.

Labor record

US Dept. of Labor enforcement · franchisee-level · FY2005–present

Federal investigators have concluded 87 wage cases against operators of this system, recovering $438K in back wages for 714 workers, including 2 child-labor cases. Some of these cases are recent, not ancient history. These cases name franchisee-owned locations, not the franchisor itself.

Concluded cases

87

Back wages owed

$438K

Employees affected

714

Since 2020

2

2 of these cases involved child-labor violations, covering 7 minors across the system's franchised locations.

Read this carefully. The employers in these cases are individual Baymont Inn & Suites franchisees — separately owned businesses operating under the brand name — not Baymont Inn & Suites itself. The franchisor is not the respondent and in most cases is not a party. What the record shows is how this system's operators run their payrolls, which is worth knowing before you become one of them. Counts rise with system size and with age: a 20-year-old, 10,000-unit system will out-count a young one regardless of conduct. Source: DOL Wage and Hour Division concluded compliance actions, FY2005–present, most recent finding 2023.

Distress signals

news-sourced · bankruptcies, closures, lawsuits

No recent closures, bankruptcies, or major lawsuits found in the news for Baymont Inn & Suites. That's a good sign — but it reflects news coverage, not a guarantee.

Before you sign anythingfree · 30 min · no commission

A broker is paid by the franchisor to place you. An independent CPA is paid by you — and the job is pressure-testing Baymont Inn & Suites's numbers, including talking you out of a bad deal.

Talk to an independent CPA before you buy →
Baymont Inn & Suites franchise: SBA loan defaults & failure rate (2026) · Franchise Watch Desk