Verified — real FDD extraction
Not found in the SBA Franchise Directory under this name — though SBA loans to its franchisees exist; verify eligibility with your lender
PITA PIT
Other · independent · est. —
Pita Pit is a quick-service restaurant chain serving made-to-order grilled pita sandwiches with fresh toppings. A franchisee operates a counter-service storefront serving lunch, dinner, and late-night customers, often near campuses and urban centers.
PITA PIT net unit count grew +14.3% from 2013–2015 per its FDD Item 20.
New to franchising? Start here
A franchise is a business where you (the franchisee) pay a company (the franchisor) for the right to open and run a location using their brand and system — think a local Anytime Fitness or Taco John's owned by a small-business owner, not the corporation.
Before you can buy in, U.S. law requires the franchisor to give you a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) — a long legal filing covering its fees, finances, and history. The numbers on this page come straight from that document:
- Franchise fee — the one-time cost to buy in.
- Royalty — the ongoing cut of your sales you pay the franchisor.
- Item 20 — how many locations opened and closed, the basis for our verdict (from Proven & strong down to Distressed — or Too new to judge).
The verdict
Proven & steady
Distress
The operating record is solid, but the FDD discloses a bankruptcy history (Item 4) — capped below a full endorsement. The standout in the record: the system is growing.
Exit rate · latest year
8.6%
fiscal 2015, per Item 20
Cost to open
$211K–$366K
Item 7 total investment range
SBA loan defaults
30.6%
vs 14.8% avg across rated brands
Behind the verdict
the record, factor by factor · Item 20
3-yr trend · Item 20 Table 1
terminations + ceased-ops vs. all exits · Table 3
transfers vs. base · Table 3
actual vs. projected openings · Table 5
Item 19 disclosure + completeness
Systemwide units
2013–2015
Survival record
FDD Item 20 · outlet status by year
In fiscal 2015, 18 of 210 franchised outlets left the system — a 8.6% annualized exit rate. Not every exit is a failure — but this is the measurable floor.
Show the outlet tables ↓Hide the evidence ↑
| Status (FTC) | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outlets at start | 198 | 210 | 224 |
| Opened | 31 | 33 | 36 |
| Transfers | 15 | 16 | 6 |
| Terminations | 7 | 6 | 14 |
| Non-renewals | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reacquired by franchisor | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Ceased — other reasons | 7 | 10 | 4 |
| Outlets at end | 210 | 224 | 240 |
| Net change | +12 | +14 | +16 |
The lender's view
SBA 7(a)/504 loan performance · FY1991–present
Banks have made 161 SBA-backed loans to PITA PIT franchisees since 2004. Of the 134 that have resolved, 30.6% were charged off (defaulted) rather than paid in full, versus 14.8% across 576 rated brands.
30.6%
41 of 134 resolved defaulted
68.4%
avg. charged-off $ ÷ approved $
20.9%
default rate × loss severity
$198,866
what recent franchisees borrowed
53 mo
approval → charge-off, defaulted loans
4 vs 19
distinct banks — pulling back
Charge-off rate by loan approval year (%)
SOURCE: SBA 7(a)/504 FOIA LOAN DATA (DATA.SBA.GOV), FY1991–PRESENT · MATCHED TO PITA PIT BY FRANCHISE NAME · RESOLVED = CHARGED-OFF + PAID-IN-FULL
The owner's side of the deal
FDD × federal loan record
Who finances it
the Huntington National Bank
10.1% of this brand's loans
That lender charges off 10.0% of its loans to other franchise brands, vs 14.8% nationally.
Who buys it
54.6%
first-time franchise owners
The rest already owned at least one other franchise. Across the corpus, brands bought mostly by repeat operators charge off at roughly 10% versus 17% for brands sold mostly to newcomers.
Does experience help here?
−1.3pp
multi-unit vs single-unit owners
Owners of multiple units default at 25.6%; single-unit owners at 26.9%.
Computed from 161 SBA 7(a)/504 loans to PITA PIT franchisees joined to the brand's own FDD. Debt service assumes level amortization at the average disclosed term and rate. A lender's rate excludes its loans to this brand, so it reads the lender, not the brand.
What it costs — and what it drags
FDD Items 5–7 · fees, investment, royalty
Buying in means a $30K franchise fee (Item 5) and a total investment of $211K–$366K (Item 7). The franchisor publishes an earnings claim (Item 19) — read its methodology closely.
To open (Item 7)
$211K–$366K
all-in investment range
Franchise fee (Item 5)
$30K
upfront, one-time
Royalty (Item 6)
6%
of sales, ongoing
Your figure — cross-check against this brand's Item 19 and current-owner validation.
Royalty you'd pay / yr
$60K
6% of sales, before profit
Over a 10-yr term
$600K
royalties alone, excl. ad fund
This is not profit. It's the only money the FDD actually pins down — what you put in, and the royalty you owe on every dollar of sales. Your real take-home depends on labor, rent, food cost, and ramp-to-breakeven, none of which any FDD discloses.
Build a real pro-forma for PITA PIT with an independent CPALabor record
US Dept. of Labor enforcement · franchisee-level · FY2005–present
Federal investigators have concluded 10 wage cases against operators of this system, recovering $18K in back wages for 119 workers, including 4 child-labor cases. These cases name franchisee-owned locations, not the franchisor itself.
Concluded cases
10
Back wages owed
$18K
Employees affected
119
Since 2020
0
4 of these cases involved child-labor violations, covering 16 minors across the system's franchised locations.
Read this carefully. The employers in these cases are individual PITA PIT franchisees — separately owned businesses operating under the brand name — not PITA PIT itself. The franchisor is not the respondent and in most cases is not a party. What the record shows is how this system's operators run their payrolls, which is worth knowing before you become one of them. Counts rise with system size and with age: a 20-year-old, 10,000-unit system will out-count a young one regardless of conduct. Source: DOL Wage and Hour Division concluded compliance actions, FY2005–present, most recent finding 2016.
Modeled risk
FDD Risk Score · modeled from the public record
Modeled from the public record, this brand sits mid-pack: riskier than 55% of systems we score.
Risk percentile
55 / 100
Measured
Modeled SBA charge-off
13.3%
Observed SBA charge-off
30.6%
Top drivers: Single-lender dependence (raises) · Share financed by high-loss lenders (lowers) · Investment ceiling (log) (raises) · System size (log units) (lowers). 50+ resolved loans and complete disclosure data — the score is checkable against the brand's observed rate. A linear scorecard built from this brand's own disclosure figures plus the federal loan record behind its franchisees; full spec and cross-validated accuracy on the methodology page. A score is context, not a verdict.
Distress signals
news-sourced · bankruptcies, closures, lawsuits
No recent closures, bankruptcies, or major lawsuits found in the news for PITA PIT. That's a good sign — but it reflects news coverage, not a guarantee.
A broker is paid by the franchisor to place you. An independent CPA is paid by you — and the job is pressure-testing PITA PIT's numbers, including talking you out of a bad deal.
Talk to an independent CPA before you buy →PITA PIT franchise questions, answered from the filings
What percentage of PITA PIT franchises closed last year?
In PITA PIT's latest FDD Item 20 (fiscal 2015), 18 of 210 franchised outlets left the system — an annualized exit rate of 8.6%. That counts terminations, non-renewals, and "ceased operations — other reasons." There is no official failure rate, and not every exit is a failure, but this is the measurable floor.
How much does a PITA PIT franchise cost?
Per PITA PIT's 2020 FDD, buying in requires an initial franchise fee of $30K (Item 5) and a total initial investment of $211K–$366K (Item 7).
What royalty does PITA PIT charge?
PITA PIT charges an ongoing royalty of 6.0% of gross sales, per Item 6 of its 2020 FDD.
Does PITA PIT disclose earnings (Item 19)?
Yes — PITA PIT makes a financial performance representation in Item 19 of its 2020 FDD. Read it closely: franchisors choose which units and which metrics to include.
How often do SBA loans for PITA PIT franchises default?
Across 161 SBA-backed loans to PITA PIT franchisees since 2004, 41 of the 134 that have resolved were charged off — a 30.6% default rate, versus about 14.8% across all rated franchise brands. This is the lender's-eye view of franchisee failure, drawn from public SBA 7(a)/504 FOIA data and independent of the franchisor's own disclosures.